Why Long-Term Care Insurance Fails High-Net-Worth Retirees With $3 Million or More
- Vitaly Novok
- Jul 8
- 2 min read
Most retirees with $2–5 million in assets believe they've “done enough” to prepare for future care needs. But there's a costly oversight hiding in many financial plans: long-term care insurance that doesn't live up to its promises. These policies often feel like the responsible choice - until it’s time to use them. And by then, it's too late.
The Real Cost: $500,000 or More
Long-term care isn’t a distant what-if. It’s a looming, six-figure reality. A five-year stay in a memory care facility can easily cost $500,000 or more. For high-net-worth families, these costs won’t be covered by Medicaid and may not be fully covered by your policy, either. Even with insurance, premium hikes, strict claim rules, and asset exposure can devastate a retirement plan carefully built over decades.
Why the Conventional Wisdom Fails
“Just buy long-term care insurance” sounds smart until you realize it’s designed more for middle-income households than well-off ones. Wealthier retirees are often left underinsured, with policies capped below actual care costs. Worse, benefits can be delayed by waiting periods, or denied due to narrow definitions of what qualifies as care. And yet, the premiums keep rising. Many families find themselves wondering: Was this really the best solution?
Tax and Financial Consequences
If you tap into IRA funds to cover care, you’ll face full ordinary income tax on every withdrawal. That’s not just a cash flow hit - it’s a compounding tax drag that can shrink your portfolio faster than expected. Failing to structure your long-term care planning properly can lead to higher Medicare premiums, reduced Social Security benefits, and even IRS scrutiny down the line. The ripple effect is real and expensive.
That’s why it’s critical to rethink whether traditional long-term care insurance for high-net-worth retirees is the right approach—or whether more flexible, strategic alternatives make better sense.
That’s why it’s critical to rethink whether traditional long-term care insurance for high-net-worth individuals is the right approach—or whether more flexible, strategic alternatives make better sense.
Five Smart Alternatives to Long-Term Care Insurance for High-Net-Worth Retirees
Create a dedicated care fund
Set aside $150K–$250K in a growth-oriented account to cover early care costs without relying on restrictive insurance benefits.
Reposition assets for protection
Move wealth into more protected structures—like Roth IRAs or trusts—to reduce exposure to taxes, creditors, or Medicaid recovery.
Use family care contracts
Legally pay adult children to coordinate care, keeping money in the family and reducing countable assets if Medicaid becomes necessary.
Relocate for lower care costs
Consider high-quality care communities in lower-cost regions where annual expenses may be 30–50% less than metro areas.
Plan early for Medicaid eligibility
Take advantage of the five-year lookback window by using trusts, transfers, and spousal strategies that preserve wealth while gaining access to benefits.
The Time to Act Is Before the Crisis Hits
By the time long-term care is needed, your best planning window has closed. The costs become real, emotions run high, and poor preparation can trigger resentment that lasts generations. Avoiding or delaying the conversation is one of the most expensive mistakes retirees make. Now is the time to rethink your strategy - and do it right.
Ready to protect your legacy with confidence?
Let’s start a conversation. Book a free initial call and learn how we can help you protect what you’ve built and secure a stronger financial future for your loved ones.
Comments